Is it time to subscribe to a printer service from HP?

Ever since my dad brought home an...

What’s the best way of buying a phone today?

How did you buy your latest phone?...

MWC: What device highlights did you miss?

So, early last week I predicted that...

Microsoft Living Dangerously, Buys Sidekick Company

vistalogo-thumb
Microsoft just announced at the 2008 Mobile World Congress that it will be acquiring Danger Inc., the company who created and supports the popular Sidekick range of handhelds offered by T-Mobile. Microsoft’s current mobile offering, Windows Mobile 6 (both Professional and Standard) is often slammed for being too ‘businessy’, with a bigger focus on the enterprise user and not enough multimedia/consumer-friendly features.

This makes total sense to me. Microsoft’s OS currently sucks for consumers, compared to multimedia- and consumer-friendly Symbian OS and more recently, RIM’s Blackberry OS and the iPhone. Rather than attempt to overhaul their OS, which is rumored to not be updated fully until 2009, they’re simply going to buy Yahoo! and Danger, both top-level for mobile consumer-friendly services and products.

Genius. Completely genius. Just hope they don’t screw it up.

4 COMMENTS

  1. genius? are you serious? sure, its the right thing to do, and i know it’s tough to find ANYTHING to applaud microsoft for, but lets not go overboard – microsoft purchased the vast majority of its technology, this is just their modus operandi.

    genius? realizing one’s limitations is more profound than some people realize, but it’s a far cry from genius.

  2. I think it’s genius because Danger has a wealth of information as to the mobile practices and preferences of the young connected crowd, and has created a server-based system for delivering them content that they eat up. Personally, I’m surprised no other company snapped them up quicker, to be honest.

    Ricky’s last blog post..Vodafone chooses Blackberry as key standard

  3. fair enough – i suppose i’ll give you “acting before anyone else did” as a more meaningful act than simply “buying up another tech company” as i took it for. still, i think we’ll have to see what the big boys do with their new toys before declaring much in the way of mental clarity. personally, i’m hoping for something to come out of that company that piques my interest. i’ve got nothing against monopolies – AT&T was once like microsoft is today, but during that time they gave (really, GAVE) us the transistor. where is microsoft’s big contribution? another tech buy-out. if they use Danger to do something really clever i’ll be proud of them – i hope they do, they are quite overdue.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recently Published

Is it time to subscribe to a printer service from HP?

Ever since my dad brought home an HP LaserJet printer (version 3, if memory serves), I have been printing with an HP. Over the...

What’s the best way of buying a phone today?

How did you buy your latest phone? I'm asking because I'm thinking about what I should be doing. When I was living in Oman, I...

MWC: What device highlights did you miss?

So, early last week I predicted that next to nothing from Mobile World Congress would break through into the mainstream media. I was right,...

How Wireless Will Pave the Path to Neobank Profitability

I'm delighted to bring you an opinion piece from Rafa Plantier at Gigs.com. I think it's particularly relevant given the recent eSIM news from...

An end of an era: Vodafone UK turns off 3G services

I thought it was worthwhile highlighting this one from the Vodafone UK team. For so long - for what feels like years, seeing the...

Mobile World Congress: Did the mainstream media notice?

I resolved this year to make sure I wrote something - anything - about Mobile World Congress, the huge mobile industry trade show taking...